Key Takeaways
PE faces rising zombie companies in 2025, impacting exits. Analyze causes, implications, and solutions for firms struggling with illiquid assets and $1 trillion in unsold assets.
Market Introduction
Private equity faces a surge in zombie companies in 2025, with revenue growth at a mere 0.2%, impacting exits. This trend poses significant implications for PE exits and illiquid assets, affecting fund performance and future fundraising capabilities. As of Nov 12, 2025, PwC estimates $1 trillion in unsold assets.
This inability to divest underperforming assets is a critical concern for PE firms. The prolonged holding periods of 5.6 years, up from 4.8 years, highlight the growing challenges in asset liquidity and realization.
Key metrics show a concerning trend: Average PE holding period increased by 16.7%, unsold assets surged 25.0%, and zombie company revenue growth plunged 60.0%.
This analysis explores the causes, implications, and potential solutions for PE firms navigating this complex market.
Data at a Glance
| Metric | Previous | Current | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average PE Holding Period (Years) | 4.8 | 5.6 | +16.7% |
| Unsold Assets (USD Trillion) | 0.8 | 1.0 | +25.0% |
| Revenue Growth (Zombie Co.) | 0.5% | 0.2% | -60.0% |
In-Depth Analysis
The private equity landscape is experiencing a significant rise in illiquid “zombie companies,” a stark contrast to its historical performance. Traditionally, PE thrived on rapid asset turnover, fueled by economic expansion and accessible debt. However, the post-2021 era has presented challenges with rising interest rates escalating debt servicing costs and a general market slowdown dampening buyer appetite. This has created a liquidity freeze, reminiscent of post-2008 conditions but uniquely focused on operational stagnation within portfolio companies rather than just refinancing risks. This shift has eroded market sentiment and investor confidence in traditional PE strategies, necessitating a re-evaluation of established models and performance benchmarks, especially as indicated by the extended holding periods and increased unsold assets, a trend confirmed by PwC estimates of $1 trillion in unsold assets by November 2025. Historical patterns suggest this stagnation is a growing concern for fund managers globally.
These “zombie companies” are characterized by their inability to achieve meaningful revenue growth or generate sufficient free cash flow to cover debt obligations, making them unattractive to conventional buyers and difficult to divest. Private equity General Partners (GPs) face immense pressure to avoid realizing losses, as poor track records can jeopardize future fundraising from Limited Partners (LPs). Consequently, there’s a strong incentive to extend holding periods, a strategy becoming increasingly unsustainable due to fund lifecycles and LPs’ need for capital redeployment. Analysis of key metrics like EBITDA margin and debt-to-equity ratios confirms a worsening trend across the industry, with zombie companies exhibiting an average revenue growth of just 0.2%, a significant decline from previous periods. This operational inefficiency is a key red flag for investors.
This challenge is not isolated, with global private equity firms reporting similar difficulties in exiting portfolio companies. While regional market conditions, such as limited buyer pools in South Africa, can exacerbate the issue, the root cause lies in the broader economic environment and the specific struggles of underperforming, debt-laden businesses. Competitors like Bridgepoint and KKR are grappling with the same core problem: a lack of operational improvement and exit opportunities. Surveys from Preqin and PitchBook highlight the increasing prevalence of “zombie funds,” underscoring the systemic nature of this challenge and the widespread valuation pressures faced by many firms globally, making the current $1 trillion in unsold assets a stark reality and a key indicator of market health. Regulatory impacts, such as potential changes to capital gains tax, could further influence exit strategies.
The long-term implications for private equity are substantial. While traditional exit avenues are currently blocked, new strategies may emerge. The “retailization” of private equity, bringing mass-affluent and private wealth capital with potentially longer holding periods and lower return expectations, could offer a partial solution by absorbing illiquid assets. However, risks persist, including further economic downturns or prolonged high-interest rates. Investors should monitor evolving PE strategies, the growth of secondary markets, and potential regulatory changes affecting distressed asset sales and fund structures. Upcoming fund performance reviews and regulatory shifts are key events to watch for potential shifts in the PE landscape, with many analysts suggesting a cautious approach.
About the Author
